ChatGPT's Studio Ghibli AI art trend is a disservice to the essence of life

AI-generated Ghibli art sparks debate on creativity and copyright.

: OpenAI's update to ChatGPT now allows users to create art mimicking Studio Ghibli's style, which has led to controversy. Sam Altman supported the trend by changing his profile picture to an AI-generated Ghibli-style image. Critics, including Studio Ghibli co-founder Hayao Miyazaki, argue that this undermines the artistry and labor of professional animators. This situation highlights ongoing legal and ethical concerns about AI's impact on creative industries and copyrighted content.

OpenAI's latest update to ChatGPT grants users the ability to create images in the style of Studio Ghibli, an iconic Japanese animation studio known for films like Spirited Away and My Neighbor Totoro. Previously, OpenAI had refrained from enabling such capabilities to avoid potential copyright issues. A trend has emerged where users share AI-generated Ghibli-style images, including personal photos like weddings, transformed by AI into what appears to be scenes from Ghibli films. OpenAI seems to be endorsing this trend, with CEO Sam Altman changing his profile picture to a Ghibli-style AI-generated image of himself and commenting on social media with humorous narrative-style posts.

Hayao Miyazaki, co-founder of Studio Ghibli, is a vocal critic of AI-generated art, expressing his disdain in NHK’s 2016 documentary Never-Ending Man. In the documentary, Miyazaki was shown a demonstration of AI-generated content and reacted by calling it an insult to life itself. His criticism stems from the belief that the pains and labor invested in art by human hands give it unique value, a sentiment shared by many in the art community. Miyazaki's works, such as scenes in The Wind Rises, are renowned for their meticulous craftsmanship, with sequences taking months to complete, underscoring Miyazaki's apprehension toward AI art.

In the context of AI technology and its implications for copyright laws, this trend poses significant questions. The easy replication of distinct art styles by AI threatens the livelihoods of professional artists and voice actors who dedicate extensive time mastering their crafts. The potential for copyright infringement has led many to question the ethical and legal boundaries of AI’s capabilities, with experts advocating for clear regulatory frameworks to protect artistic intellectual property.

Critics argue that the democratization of art through AI, as touted by some proponents, diminishes the cultural and artistic value of original works. The debate has reached political spheres, with the White House's social media engaging in the trend, further complicating sentiments around AI and culture. The concern is that AI outputs, perceived as diminishing the human element of creativity, might transform artistic expressions into mere digital commodities, stripping away their cultural depths.

Should Hall of Fame animator and Studio Ghibli pursue legal action against OpenAI, it would set a crucial precedent for how AI technology is used in creative processes. As AI capabilities advance, distinguishing between human creation and algorithmic output becomes increasingly challenging, prompting urgent discussions about redefining creativity and ownership in the digital age. This ongoing discourse continues to shape perspectives on the integration of AI within the arts and informs future legislation to mediate between technological advances and human creativity.

Sources: NHK, Studio Ghibli, OpenAI, io9, White House, Twitter

AIethicsEntertainment