Does exoplanet K2-18b host alien life or not? Here's why the debate continues
Debate on alien life in K2-18b’s atmosphere due to suspected DMS, but evidence and signature validity questioned.

The ongoing debate regarding the existence of alien life on exoplanet K2-18b remains a hot topic within the astronomical community. This discussion traces back to a controversial study published in 2023 that suggested the presence of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) in the planet's atmosphere. DMS is generally produced by bacteria and phytoplankton in Earth's oceans, often considered a biosignature indicative of potential life. However, further examination revealed that DMS might not be a definitive marker for life, as new research has discovered it on a comet without requiring biological activity for its creation.
The skepticism surrounding the initial findings of DMS on K2-18b is based on two primary concerns. Edward Schwieterman, an astrobiologist at the University of California at Riverside, emphasized the lack of convincing evidence due to the low statistical confidence of these detections. According to Schwieterman, two factors are critical: the reality of the detected signal as DMS and correctly attributing its source to life forms. Many peers in the scientific community, including Ryan MacDonald from the University of Michigan, supported these concerns since comparable confidence level signatures they encountered "completely vanish" when using different data models.
Another aspect that fuels the debate is whether K2-18b can truly be deemed habitable. Located 120 light-years away, this has been speculated to have mild temperatures and possibly contain liquid oceans underneath a hydrogen-rich atmosphere, factors crucial for sustaining life as understood on Earth. The exoplanet, orbiting the cool dwarf star K2-18, is 8.6 times more massive than Earth, and current spectrum data obtained through observation tools, including Webb's NIRISS and NIRSpec, indicates methane, carbon dioxide, and a suspected DMS presence. Nikku Madhusudhan, a leading astrophysicist at the University of Cambridge, acknowledges the weak evidence regarding DMS but maintains that its confirmed presence would be significant.
The discussions have also prompted scientists to question the reliability of DMS as a biosignature. Joanna Barstow, a planetary scientist from The Open University, explains that the best method is to explore other possible explanations for DMS's presence in measurable quantities. Historical laboratory experiments and a 2024 study detecting DMS on a comet indicate that such signatures could result from non-biological processes, suggesting reassessment of its utility as a life indicator. Nora Hänni's work at the University of Bern proposes comets potentially serving as vehicles, depositing DMS onto exoplanets upon impact, yet calls for more rigorous investigation before drawing conclusions.
Many uncertainties loom over interpreting K2-18b's atmospheric data and the exoplanet's general habitability status. Schwieterman, MacDonald, and others call for acquiring further observations using diverse instruments to potentially establish DMS's authentic presence and assess its implications for extraterrestrial life. Madhusudhan supports these ongoing efforts, sharing that more studies will unfold in the coming year, summing up that persistence in data collection and technological advancement may soon clarify the prospects of life beyond Earth in places like K2-18b.
Sources: Space.com, University of California Riverside, University of Michigan, The Open University, University of Cambridge, University of Bern.