Gemini Live could use some more rehearsals

Google's Gemini Live lacks reliability and personality, struggling with technical issues and inconsistent performance.

: Google's Gemini Live aims for more engaging chatbot interactions with natural voices but falls short due to technical flaws and inconsistent responses. Users can't adjust voice settings, and the bot often provides unreliable information. It struggles with comprehending and maintaining conversations accurately.

Google's Gemini Live, marketed as a more engaging chatbot with realistic voices, fails to deliver consistent, reliable performance. Although it offers more natural interactions than previous Google AIs, it is marred by issues like hallucinations and an inability to accurately answer questions about people, places, and things. Users can't customize the bot's voice or pace, making it less adaptable than OpenAI's Advanced Voice Mode. Additionally, it frequently misinterprets simple games and provides dubious advice, revealing its struggle to maintain coherent and trustworthy dialogues.

Technical problems exacerbate these issues, with frequent interruptions in the bot's voice and difficulty in recognizing user inputs. Gemini Live also lacks many integrations available in text-based Gemini, limiting its utility. Although Google plans to enhance the bot with image and video interpretation in the future, the current version seems more like a prototype.

Overall, Gemini Live, part of Google's $20-per-month Google One AI Premium Plan, doesn't offer enough advantages over text-based chatbots. Its reliability and engagement issues overshadow its conversational flow improvements, making it hard to justify its use over more established AI solutions. The bot's criticisms of user interactions further highlight its shortcomings, pointing to a need for more development and fine-tuning.

chatbotGenerative AIVoice Interaction