Google dominates online ads, says antitrust trial witness, but publishers are feeling ‘stuck’

Google's ad tech tool monopolizes market; publishers feel trapped in antitrust trial testimony.

: A federal court antitrust trial against Google has revealed significant concerns from publishers about the dominance of Google's ad tech tools. Stephanie Layser, a former News Corp executive, testified that Google's unified pricing rules disadvantage publishers, leaving them with little choice but to use Google’s ad server. Layser's testimony is part of the government's case, arguing that Google's control stifles competition and innovation. Google maintains that the government is penalizing its success.

The federal court is currently addressing an antitrust trial against Google, focusing on the control it exercises over ad tech tools. Stephanie Layser, a former executive at News Corp, testified that Google's unified pricing rules introduced in 2019 prevent publishers from adequately negotiating higher floor prices, compelling them to use the company's ad server.

Despite evaluating alternatives like AppNexus, Layser stated that switching from Google's tools was not feasible due to the risk of losing significant revenue. She described the Google Ad Manager as outdated and limiting, yet essential due to the absence of viable alternatives and its extensive market share.

Google's attorneys, during their cross-examination, emphasized News Corp's acknowledgment of its competitiveness, arguing against the government's stance. Other testimonies included Jay Friedman of the Goodway Group, who also highlighted the challenges in negotiating with Google, and Eisar Lipkovitz, a former Google VP, who attributed the lack of alternatives to the complexity of such products.

Googlead techAntitrust