Google tells Gemini users it will review their texts regardless of their consent

Google will review Gemini users' texts without consent starting July 7, raising privacy concerns.

: Google informed Android users that the Gemini app will have access to critical apps on devices, starting July 7, regardless of user consent. This has generated privacy concerns as users will need to manually disable the feature through an unclear settings page. Google will store user data for up to 72 hours, and in some instances, this data may be reviewed by a human. This policy has raised doubts about privacy in an era where AI is expected to hold personal details securely.

Google has recently communicated to Android users that the Gemini app will automatically access and utilize critical functionalities on their smartphones, such as Phone, Messages, WhatsApp, and Utilities. This change will take effect on July 7, regardless of the user's previous opt-in status. According to the email, users concerned about privacy have the option to turn Gemini's access off via the Apps settings page. However, the lack of detail on how to do this has turned the ability to protect one's privacy into a confusing task.

The notification has triggered a wave of privacy concerns among users as the email indicated that data collected by Gemini may be stored for up to 72 hours and can, at times, be reviewed by humans. Although Google allows the deactivation of certain features, the ambiguity around what will be disabled leaves users in a precarious position about their privacy. This development has compelled privacy advocates to question how much data the AI has access to and the transparency with which this data is handled.

This situation highlights the increasing complexities and ethical considerations of integrating AI into everyday tasks. Not only does this raise issues around data collection without explicit consent, but it also signifies that the era of truly agentic AI might disrupt traditionally private spaces, such as one's personal smartphone operations. Users are urged to reconsider the level of trust they are willing to place in AI functionalities capable of holding onto potentially sensitive personal information.

By default, Google’s implementation could lead to widespread publication of data without users being vigilant or even wholly aware. This resembles previously voiced concerns surrounding voice assistants, yet adds an additional layer of complexity and intrusion. It has spurred discussions around the necessary guidelines and regulations to safeguard personal data effective in the age of increasing, pervasive AI systems.

The crucial takeaway is that last attempts at reasserting privacy might fall short if users are not fully informed or technologically adept, raising questions about consent and the protection of personal data. As Gizmodo’s report emphasizes, the matter demands serious consideration about user consent and its management, as well as the consequences of allowing AI into deeper aspects of our lives.

Sources: Gizmodo, Reddit, AndroidPolice, GeekHampton

AIPrivacyMobile