How did Earth get such a strange moon? Exploring the giant impact theory
The moon's origin relates to the giant impact hypothesis with Theia colliding Earth.

The moon's formation is a fascinating tale resulting from a colossal collision event in the early solar system. This event involves a young Earth and a Mars-sized body known as Theia. According to the giant impact hypothesis, detailed in Paul Sutter's exploration, Theia's collision with Earth dramatically altered both celestial bodies. The collision resulted in the amalgamation of Theia’s core into Earth’s, expanding Earth’s core. The mantle and crust of both bodies were fragmented and propelled into space, with some fragments coalescing to form the moon over time.
This hypothesis is supported by several intriguing observations. For instance, lunar samples reveal the presence of KREEPs (potassium, rare-earth elements, and phosphorus), which indicates a molten origin requiring immense energy. Moreover, the moon displays isotopic similarities to Earth, suggesting that they evolved from the same primordial clump of material. This theory also accounts for the unique angular momentum observed in the Earth-moon system, which exceeds that of any other terrestrial planet.
Despite being the most widely accepted explanation, the giant impact hypothesis is not without its challenges. Some features of the moon, such as the presence of volatile compounds like water trapped within rocks, suggest an inconsistency; a cataclysmic impact should have eradicated such elements. Furthermore, there is no geological evidence on Earth to support the existence of extensive magma seas that would have resulted from an impact of this scale, raising questions about the complete applicability of the hypothesis.
To further understand the moon's formation, researchers explore alternative scenarios, such as the possibility of a high-speed impact or the rapid spin of the proto-Earth. Some suggest that a second small moon formed and eventually merged into the current lunar body, accounting for the topographical differences between the moon’s near and far sides. These alternate scenarios attempt to address the discrepancies and provide a comprehensive understanding of the moon's origin.
The analysis of these impact scenarios offers a broader insight into planetary formation and the dynamics of early solar system events. Continuous exploration, advanced simulations, and lunar sample analyses contribute to refining our understanding of how the moon came to be. Without a definitive time-travel mechanism, these theoretical models serve as the best tools for scientists to unravel the moon's lengthy and complex creation story.
Sources: Space.com, Science Magazine, NASA, Astrophysical Journal, Lunar and Planetary Science Conferences