Software developers increasingly use AI, but their trust in it has diminished

Developers eagerly embrace AI tools, yet their trust wanes due to hidden errors causing debugging delays.

: Software developers are increasingly incorporating AI tools into their work, but confidence in these tools diminishes despite widespread use. A Stack Overflow poll of 49,000 developers indicates 80% use AI tools in 2025, but only 29% trust their accuracy, a decline from 40% in prior surveys. Developers frequently encounter AI-generated solutions with subtle flaws, prolonging debugging, notably affecting junior developers. Despite challenges, developers and managers continue using AI tools, acknowledging their benefits while stressing the importance of cautious use.

The integration of AI tools into software development is on the rise, yet a growing sense of skepticism surrounds their reliability. According to an extensive poll conducted by Stack Overflow involving 49,000 professional developers, 80% reported using AI tools as part of their work in 2025. Despite this significant uptake, trust in these tools has diminished, with only 29% of developers expressing confidence in their accuracy, a notable decline from previous years where trust levels were over 40%. The discord between widespread adoption and increasing skepticism highlights the complex role of AI-powered coding assistants like GitHub Copilot.

Developers have reported ongoing frustration with AI solutions that appear nearly correct but contain subtle errors. These near-misses, rather than clear inaccuracies, create hidden bugs and logic errors that demand extensive debugging time. Junior developers are particularly vulnerable, as they tend to accept AI-generated code without critical evaluation, often needing to rely on resources like Stack Overflow to resolve resultant issues. This is further evidenced by a third of developers seeking help on Stack Overflow for AI-related challenges caused by AI-generated code.

Recent advancements in reasoning-focused AI models have enhanced reliability, yet the persistent 'close-but-not-quite' problem continues. This stems from the nature of predictive text generation, which sometimes produces almost correct solutions that can still be flawed. The survey highlighted that 72% of developers are wary of 'vibe coding', the practice of casually inserting AI-suggested code into production without thorough scrutiny, underscoring the need for a balanced approach to AI tool usage.

Despite these challenges, developers and their managers are not abandoning AI tools. Instead, there is an emphasis on careful usage to harness their benefits, with developers acknowledging that these tools can serve as educational tools. AI tools can reduce the learning curve for new programming languages or frameworks by offering targeted information that supplements traditional documentation searches, a void traditionally filled by services like Stack Overflow. Industry experts recommend that developers view AI autocomplete tools as 'sparring partners' rather than passive copilots, encouraging a proactive engagement with AI suggestions to maximize their value.

Jody Bailey, Chief Product and Technology Officer at Stack Overflow, highlighted in an interview with Venture Beat that the platform is adapting to changes in how developers use AI for seeking assistance and sharing knowledge. Despite a decline in traffic, Bailey contends that the shift is not as severe as perceived and emphasizes that the platform is evaluating new metrics for success in this evolving digital landscape.

Sources: TechSpot, Stack Overflow Blog, Venture Beat

AISoftwareMachine Learning